On Sun, 6 Jan 2002, David S. Miller wrote: > Some of the low end single zone machines (m68k, sparc32, arm etc) > could benefit from losing ->virtual too. > Sparc32 has kmapping, so it would need virtual. I'm curious to see how large the tradeoff is with calculating virtual in page_address(). The overhead there may be larger than the win we get from better cacheline footprint in struct page -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- results: Remove 8 bytes from struct page on 64bit archsAnton Blanchard <anton _at_ samba.org>
- Re: [PATCH] Remove 8 bytes from struct page on 64bit archs"David S. Miller" <davem _at_ redhat.com>
- Prev by Date: Re: 1gb RAM + 1gb SWAP + make -j bzImage = OOM
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH]: 2.5.1pre9 change several if (x) BUG to BUG_ON(x)
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Remove 8 bytes from struct page on 64bit archs
- Next by thread: results: Remove 8 bytes from struct page on 64bit archs
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]