On Sun, 6 Jan 2002, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote: > > AFAIAC, the /proc/ide/ stuff should never have happened. > > It's proven that every bit of it can be done in userspace. > Then lets get rid of /proc/scsi , How about /proc/sys ... > What is the differance here ? Maybe I am missing something ? And what would you replace /proc/scsi/ with ? Neither of the two you mention have viable alternatives. (yet) The only time I'd consider sysctl(2) over poking /proc/sys entries would possibly be on an embedded system with no /proc/sys. And even then, I'd rather try and justify having /proc. ISTR viro proposing to split proc/sys out to sysctlfs at some point, which would solve this dilemma nicely. -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: ISA slot detection on PCI systems?"Mr. James W. Laferriere" <babydr _at_ baby-dragons.com>
- Re: ISA slot detection on PCI systems?"Mr. James W. Laferriere" <babydr _at_ baby-dragons.com>
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
- Previous by thread: Re: ISA slot detection on PCI systems?
- Next by thread: Re: ISA slot detection on PCI systems?
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]