Hi Ingo, I got your scheduler rewrite going on ppc64. Here are some initial LMbench results with sched-O1-2.4.17-B4.patch. Bear in mind the two machines are different chips (one is Power3 and the other is RS64), so some differences will result: 2 way (POWER3) summary: signal handling down a bit (GOOD) fork down a lot (very GOOD) exec, sh down (GOOD) context switches all down (GOOD) communication latencies: Pipe, AF, TCP slightly up (BAD) pipe bandwidth up (GOOD) 4 way (RS64) summary: stat up a bit (BAD) fork down a lot (very GOOD) exec, sh down (GOOD) context switches same or down (GOOD) communication latencies: Pipe, AF, TCP slightly up (BAD) pipe bandwidth up (GOOD) So far things look good. Next up I'll look at how it scales on the 12 way. Anton - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: O(1) scheduler, 2.5.2-pre9-B1 resultsIngo Molnar <mingo _at_ elte.hu>
- [patch] O(1) scheduler, 2.4.17-B0, 2.5.2-pre8-B0.Ingo Molnar <mingo _at_ elte.hu>
- [patch] O(1) scheduler, 2.5.2-pre9-B1.Ingo Molnar <mingo _at_ elte.hu>
- Prev by Date: Re: no highmem with 2GB RAM?
- Next by Date: drivers/md compile fixes.
- Previous by thread: [patch] O(1) scheduler, 2.5.2-pre9-B1.
- Next by thread: Re: O(1) scheduler, 2.5.2-pre9-B1 results
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]