Re: [patch] O(1) scheduler, 2.4.17-B0, 2.5.2-pre8-B0.

[Robert Love <rml _at_ tech9.net>]

On Sat, 2002-01-05 at 22:34, listmail _at_ majere.epithna.com wrote:
> How close are you and Robert Love on getting this patch and his pre-emt
> patches to co-operate...seems like that might bring huge wins.  I know, I
> know I could diff, and fix the rejects myself, but this seems to deep in
> the kernel for a relative newbie like myself(plus I am more a file system
> guy)

Unfortunately it looks like it is going to take a bit more than fixing
trivial rejects.  I started working on it today.  I suspect I am going
to need a lot better understanding of Ingo's scheduler, so I am learning
it.  I am traveling tomorrow but should be able to dive into it on
Monday.

Ingo and I both agree that the patches together are a Good Thing.

I have a fully ported patch at this point but it hard locks on boot.  I
believe the problem to be a few bits in sched.c, but there may be some
underlying changes that break assumptions elsewhere.

We are working on it.  Help is always appreciated, though ;)

	Robert Love

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/