Followup to: <20020105215147.GH136 _at_ pervalidus> By author: =?iso-8859-1?B?RnLpZOlyaWMgTC4gVy4=?= Meunier <0 _at_ pervalidus.net> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > On a side note, why do I need to use losetup -d after umount > when /etc/mtab is a symlink to /proc/mounts ? > > mount or loop "feature" ? > /proc/mounts, unlike /etc/mtab, doesn't tell umount(8) that this was a loopback created by mount(8) as opposed to a preexisting loopback created by losetup(8). -hpa -- <hpa _at_ transmeta.com> at work, <hpa _at_ zytor.com> in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt <amsp _at_ zytor.com> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
References:
- Re: losetuping files in tmpfs fails?Fr馘駻ic L. W. Meunier <0 _at_ pervalidus.net>
- Prev by Date: Re: losetuping files in tmpfs fails?
- Next by Date: Re: [announce] [patch] ultra-scalable O(1) SMP and UP scheduler
- Previous by thread: Re: losetuping files in tmpfs fails?
- Next by thread: Re: losetuping files in tmpfs fails?
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]