On Sat, 05 Jan 2002, willy tarreau wrote: > Perhaps people who have a solid personal tree would > like to continue this discussion off-list and find > an arrangement about a single test tree. Concerning > stable trees, I think that both Marcello's and > Andrea's are rock solid. Othe people may want to use > their distributor's. What *I* personally would greatly appreciate: the Big List of Kernel Patches. It would list a patch, what it does, what version of the kernel it is against, where it can be found, and maybe where other versions can be found or conflicts. This list could e. g. look like (cast into any form you like, an extensible one is a good idea); I've just picked a random patch that I use, without any recommendation: PATCH: Pre-Emptive Kernel AUTHOR: Robert M. Love SUMMARY: Makes most parts of the kernel preemptive to reduce latency. URL: http://www.tech9.net/rml/linux/ PATCHES-STABLE: 2.4.16, 2.4.17 <- only list patches yielding working releases PATCHES-STABLE-PRE: 2.4.18-pre1 PATCHES-DEVEL: 2.5.1 PATCHES-DEVEL-PRE: 2.5.2-pre1 REQUISITES: - CONFLICTS: O(1) scheduler Resembles MAINTAINERS? Rightly so, just more detail given. That way, we would not need to have so many distinct trees, but this could easily grow into a patch repository where people could pull their patches from. I presume that conflicts between patches meant for inclusion will be worked out; maybe this list should announce sub-versions of the patches, like Willy mentioned: PATCH: ReiserFS for ext3-enabled kernels AUTHOR: Hans Reiser et al.; Matthias Andree et al. (ext3 compatibility) URL: http://mandree.home.pages.de/kernelpatches/v2.2/v2.2.19/ PATCHES-STABLE: 2.2.19 PATCHES-STABLE-PRE: - PATCHES-DEVEL: - PATCHES-DEVEL-PRE: - REQUISITES: - CONFLICTS: - You get the idea. Comments? -- Matthias Andree "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC: The Big Patch List (was: Linux Kernel-2.4.18-nj1)John Levon <movement _at_ marcelothewonderpenguin.com>
- Re: Linux Kernel-2.4.18-nj1Tom Rini <trini _at_ kernel.crashing.org>
- Re: Linux Kernel-2.4.18-nj1willy tarreau<wtarreau _at_ yahoo.fr>
- Prev by Date: Re: slow CD ripping from moving from 2.4.4 to 2.4.17
- Next by Date: Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable
- Previous by thread: Re: Linux Kernel-2.4.18-nj1
- Next by thread: Re: RFC: The Big Patch List (was: Linux Kernel-2.4.18-nj1)
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]