jkl _at_ miacid.net writes: > Forgive me if I haven't been reading the manual carefully enough. Now can > we please get a straight answer to the question: Does GCC provide the > ability to turn an arbitrary address into a pointer, and if so how do you > do it? If you want to do more than what is permitted according to the documentation (quoted in the message by Joseph S. Myers you replied to), you have to use machine code insertions in order to get deterministic effects. At least this seems to be the consensus so far. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
References:
- Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fixjkl _at_ miacid.net
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] Visual Workstation update for 2.4.17
- Next by Date: Re: 2.5.2-pre performance degradation on an old 486 (it's thescheduler)
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]