On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 11:52:21AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > Location of Linux Kernel-2.4.18-nj1 > > Hi Nathan, > > Please don't take it bad, I don't want to flame you nor anybody, but I > think that if everyone publicly announces his own tree with his own set > of changes against the main kernel, many users will be lost quickly. > > Once, we had "only" 3 main trees for the stable release : > - Linus' official kernels > - Alan's who did an excellent job at combining a stable core with experimental > drivers > - Andrea's kernel which is more oriented towards big servers and very high > loads. > > Now that Alan is working on something else, I can easily understand that > people need a branch like the one he maintained, even if the majority of his > work has been merged into the main tree. I'd actually argue against this. When Alan picked up 2.2.x, there wasn't someone else doing an -ac'ish 2.2 release as well. Marcelo is doing 2.4.x now, and seems to be doing a good job of making sure stable stuff gets in, and other stuff doesn't. The only patches that won't make it into Marcelos tree in the very-near-term (Which is all I'll speculate about) are the preempt (and lock-break) patches. Please people, more trees are not always a better thing when you're all doing the same thing. -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: Linux Kernel-2.4.18-nj1willy tarreau<wtarreau _at_ yahoo.fr>
- Prev by Date: Binutils and the Linux kernel source finder
- Next by Date: Re: Error loading e1000.o - symbol not found
- Previous by thread: Re: Binutils and the Linux kernel source finder
- Next by thread: Re: Linux Kernel-2.4.18-nj1
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]