Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable

[Andreas Hartmann <andihartmann _at_ freenet.de>]

M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:

> On Sat, 5 Jan 2002, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> 
> 
>>I don't like special test-programs. They seldom show up the reality.
>>What we need is a kernel that behaves fine in reality - not in
>>testcases.  And before starting the test, take care, that most of ram
>>is already used for cache or buffers or applications.
>>
> 
> OK, here's some pseduo-code for a real-world test case. I haven't had a
> chance to code it up, but I'm guessing I know what it's going to do. I'd
> *love* to be proved wrong :).


I would like to try it with the oom-patch, which needed less swap in my 
tests. It could be a good test to verify the results of the rsync-test.


> # build and boot a kernel with "Magic SysRq" turned on
> # echo  1 > /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq
> # fire up "nice --19 top" as "root"
> # read "MemTotal" from /proc/meminfo
> 
> # now start the next two jobs concurrently
> 
> # write a disk file with "MemTotal" data or more in it
> 
> # perform a 2D in-place FFT of total size at least "MemTotal/2" but less
> # than "MemTotal"
> 
> Watch the "top" window like a hawk. "Cached" will grow because of the
> disk write and "free" will drop because the page cache is growing and
> the 2D FFT is using *its* memory.


Could you please tell me a programm, that does 2D FFT? I would like to 
do this test, too!

Regards,
Andreas Hartmann

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/