Hi! I am just writing an essay, an have mentioned TUX as a performance and scalability linearity recort holder with TUX, referencing the specweb99 website summary page: http://www.spec.org/osg/web99/results/web99.html However, taking a closer look, it turns out, that the above statement holds true only for 1 and 2 processor machines. Scalability already suffers at 4 processors, and at 8 processors, TUX 2.0 (7500) gets beaten by IIS 5.0 (8001), and these were measured on the same kind of box! How come, TUX is soooo good at the lowend (1 and 2 CPUs), and scales this bad? -- SaPE - Peter, Sasi - mailto:sape _at_ sch.hu - http://sape.iq.rulez.org/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: Linux scalability?"reiser.angus" <reiser.angus _at_ wanadoo.fr>
- Re: Linux OS boilerplate"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa _at_ zytor.com>
- Prev by Date: Re: Storage - redundant path failover / failback - quo vadis linux?
- Next by Date: Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up
- Prev by thread: Re: Linux OS boilerplate
- Next by thread: Re: Linux scalability?
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]