> This is to some extent a disagreement over terminology. When we say > "file", are we talking about the user interface or the implementation? It shouldn't matter; if we start using different terminology for userland, libraries, VFS implementation and filesystem design, we'll be more confused than your average luser-in-need-of-a-good-lart'ing. -- Mo McKinlay Chief Software Architect inter/open Labs ------------------------------------------------------------------------- GnuPG Key: pub 1024D/76A275F9 2000-07-22 Mo McKinlay <mmckinlay _at_ gnu.org> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
References:
- Re: abstract file (multi-part one file or multiple files?)Clayton Weaver <cgweav _at_ eskimo.com>
- Prev by Date: Re: abstract file (support multi-part)
- Next by Date: Re: Updated Linux 2.4 issues page (MPPP lockups)
- Prev by thread: Re: abstract file (multi-part one file or multiple files?)
- Next by thread: Re: abstract file (multi-part one file or multiple files?)
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]