On Sun, 20 Aug 2000, Kenneth Johansson wrote: > I have tried to burn a cd with cdrecord but all I manage to do was trash > one after another. The problem was that I could not keep the fifo filled > with data. Considering that I have the image on a raid0 with both disk > the same and each can deliver 20MB read per second and the fifo set as > hi as 20MB and niced the process to -20 that is a bit suprising. I'm curious, does my VM patch fix this or does that one foul up too? http://www.surriel.com/patches/ (time to sacrifice a coaster for Linux development) cheers, Rik -- "What you're running that piece of shit Gnome?!?!" -- Miguel de Icaza, UKUUG 2000 http://www.conectiva.com/ http://www.surriel.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: kernel test7.pre5 with no swap = funnyKenneth Johansson <ken _at_ canit.se>
- kernel test7.pre5 with no swap = funnyKenneth Johansson <ken _at_ canit.se>
- Prev by Date: Re: abstract file (support multi-part)
- Next by Date: Re: abstract file (multi-part one file or multiple files?)
- Prev by thread: kernel test7.pre5 with no swap = funny
- Next by thread: Re: kernel test7.pre5 with no swap = funny
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]