On Sat, Aug 19, 2000 at 08:31:27PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2000 19:40:18 +0200 > From: "Andi Kleen" <ak _at_ suse.de> > > On Sat, Aug 19, 2000 at 03:37:04PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > I once did a simple hack to solve that problem by adding a "VM > > identifier" to the /proc file system. The identifiers were > > just the in kernel addresses of the mm_struct. You do a > > SIGSTOP and then just search /proc for other processes with > > the same VM. > > > > And it would only work if the cloned processes are still sharing the > > same process group, which ain't necessarily so. > > There are no restrictions regarding the process group. > > I thought you sent the initial SIGSTOP to the process group, and > expected it to stop all possible interesting processes before > searching /proc. Seems that's not what you were doing. No, I look through /proc for all processes with the same vmid and ptrace them all (that's why I said it is not atomic) > > > True, but it is certainly a common case that GDB is attached right > > from the start. And even the vmid approach would benefit from > > notifications of new threads created after the initial > > attach. I don't think, constantly monitoring /proc for new threads is > > a viable alternative. > > The alternative is to run a system call ptrace and look for clone and > fork (and optimizing that by adding a syscall trace wakeup filter to the > kernel). It actually works fine, I did that in the past. > > The filter is probably pretty essential to get adequate performance. > I still think that my proposed change is cleaner. Yours just depends on all programs setting CLONE_PTRACE, which is a bit if (to make it really useful for the debugger would require a CLONE_NO_PTRACE and a sysctl, which would be too ugly) -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: CLONE_PTRACEMark Kettenis <kettenis _at_ wins.uva.nl>
- Re: CLONE_PTRACE"Andi Kleen" <ak _at_ suse.de>
- Re: CLONE_PTRACEMark Kettenis <kettenis _at_ wins.uva.nl>
- Prev by Date: Re: CLONE_PTRACE
- Next by Date: abstract file (support multi-part)
- Prev by thread: Re: CLONE_PTRACE
- Next by thread: Re: CLONE_PTRACE
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]